Talk:Team One (advertising agency)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Starting article
editI just began this article for Team One, which is a major advertising firm with substantial coverage in the independent press. I work for Team One, and I recognize that my conflict of interest means I will need independent review to ensure the article reflects Wikipedia's neutral point of view. I have done my best to do so, but am seeking other perspectives to confirm or adjust the text. -PenaCynthia (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- In response to an edit made by James Allison - Because Team One is a division of Saatchi and Saatchi and both are under Publicis Groupe, which is Public, Team One is a Public Company as well. I will look for a source that clearly establishes this.
Banner
editA banner was recently placed on the article indicating that "a major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." This is true, as I posted above; but I am interested to know what concerns there are about neutral point of view. As I described above and in my several requests for review at relevant WikiProjects, I have worked to maintain NPOV throughout my work here, and would like to address any problems I may have introduced inadvertently.
When I made this request in Feb. 2016, Sanket Edits Wiki reviewed the article and found no problems. They directed me to this advice, which I have reviewed and makes sense. But they did not find problems. I did add new sections since the version they reviewed; my more recent requests for feedback have not gotten any response. Are there problems with those additions? -PenaCynthia (talk) 21:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- You seem to have followed the procedure for dealing with a conflict of interest, but it should not be you who decides when or if the tag gets removed from the article. I'd suggest you leave a message at the COI noticeboard, or contact one of the editors who have previously helped you. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Banner was replaced with proper banner Connected contributor since the editor in question, PenaCynthia works for the agency. Geejayen (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)