Talk:Team Fortress Classic/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Niwi3 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Niwi3 (talk · contribs) 09:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Issues
edit- Seems that the nominator hasn't made any edits to the article.
- The lead contains content not present in the rest of the article. A lead should summarize the contents of the article.
- The gameplay section is badly organized and has too many subsections. Also, it contains information not understandable or interesting to the general reader.
- The development section is completely unsourced.
- A reception section is absent. A video game article cannot be comprehensive without at least some basic reaction info.
I'm sorry, but after reviewing this article, there are enough significant issues in the article in that merely placing on hold is not going to do any good, so I am going to fail this GA nomination soon. A reception section is a must for a good video game article. If you have any questions on these points, please ask. --Niwi3 (talk) 09:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)