| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TeamIndus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of TeamIndus be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in India may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright
editI have massively pruned this article because of the amount of copyright violations that existed. I'm still concerned that
is an innovative all-spherical mirrors telescope expected to be deployed as part of the lander on the lunar surface. No other UV payloads have been previously reported with an all-spherical optical design for imaging in the NUV domain and a weighting 1.2 kg. An electronics board which includes FPGA and Microcontroller is used for the data acquisition, processing, and CCD control. LUCI will observe at a fixed elevation angle and will detect stars in the near-UV (200–320 nm) to a limiting magnitude of 12 and with a field of view of ~ 28' × 20'. The primary science goal is to search for transient sources and flag them for further study
may also be a violation but cannot check the source. - Sitush (talk) 19:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Cancelled launch
editI read that Team Indus could not het at launch soon enough so they cancelled the launch; but I can't find that source any more. Looking through, these two sources state that TeamIndus was unable to pay the required launch cost: [1], [2].
Company name ≠ Team name
editI just noted that this company is actually called Axiom Research Labs [3], which registered one team as "TeamIndus" to the X Price competition. Since Axium continues its research and development, not as a competing team but as individual enterprise, I wonder if we should change the name to Axiom Research Labs. Your thoughts? Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think we should follow WP:COMMONNAME. TeamIndus is by far the more recognised name for this venture. - Sitush (talk) 20:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)