Talk:Tea in New Zealand

Latest comment: 4 days ago by Hilst in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 13:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 59 past nominations.

Panamitsu (talk) 04:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC).Reply

  •   Article is new and long enough. Hook is interesting, present and cited in the article, and the rest of the article's sourcing looks good to me as well. Earwig raises no concerns. QPQ has been taken care of. My only (minor) concern is regarding the wording of the hook. The source seems ambiguous as to what New Zealanders drank more tea than people in Britain did exactly means; is it definitely "per capita" or is it just "the total amount of tea consumed by New Zealanders was greater than the total amount of tea consumed by Britons"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PCN02WPS (talkcontribs)
  • @PCN02WPS: Thanks for the review. I interpret the source as 'per capita' because after the sentence about New Zealanders drinking more tea, it says "consumption declined over time – from 3–3.5 kilograms per person annually". And I reckon that it is unlikely that NZ would consume more tea in total than the UK because in the early 1900s NZ had a population of about 1 million whereas the UK had a population of about 40 million people. ―Panamitsu (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply