Talk:Tatts Group

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merger proposal

Unsubstantiated Point of View

edit

In the 'controversy' section, it includes a number of unverifiable, unsubstantiated assertions such as "gambling has become a problem in both these states." If there's no verification of such statements they should be removed. Aujoz (talk) 04:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

I would like to propose the merger of Tote Tasmania into this article. The company is long defunct, purchased and merged with Tatts, and it wasn't a hugely important company in its day anyway. I can find little in the way of good resources on anything but its sale. JTdaleTalk~ 05:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --The following reference [here|http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mergers-acquisitions/tatts-buys-tote-tasmania/story-fn91vdzj-1226211735773] gives details of the purchase by Tatts. Tote now UBet has a high profile in Tasmania at race courses and pubs, so my opinion is relevant. --TinTin (talk) 04:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merge completed; UBet is discussed and linked from the Tatts page. Klbrain (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tatts Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply