| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taking Back Sunday article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Taking Back Sunday was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Xicusunshine.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Critique an Article: Is this article Neutral? Citations? Updated?
editThis WIki article about the band "Taking Back Sunday" is very informative and interesting. Although the general tone of the article is neutral, some sections lack neutrality and seem to lean to a specific side, or seem to come from a biased/personals source. For example, when discussing the early history years, the author used vocabulary such as "so-called" . Furthermore, they speak about the band's influenced during the time, yet leave no citations or sources of the information, which leads me to believe the author presented the material based on their own experiences rather than an actual source. There are not many citations. Furthermore, although there are a bits of information on the band's current years, there isn't a lot of concentration on them. Most of the focus is on the earlier years of the bands success. Since 2012, the band has toured a number of times and has released two new albums, which definitely means there should be more updated information on them. Xicusunshine (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Taking Back Sunday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107024014/http://www.takingbacksunday.com/news/2010/03/29/note-matt-rubano to http://www.takingbacksunday.com/news/2010/03/29/note-matt-rubano
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716191152/http://www.takingbacksunday.com/news/2010/03/29/matt-fazzi to http://www.takingbacksunday.com/news/2010/03/29/matt-fazzi
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Taking Back Sunday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402180836/http://www.drummagazine.com/features/post/mark-oconnell-toughens-taking-back-sunday/ to http://www.drummagazine.com/features/post/mark-oconnell-toughens-taking-back-sunday/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110704230736/http://www.takingbacksunday.com/news/2011/06/01/all-now-4th-poster-reveal to http://www.takingbacksunday.com/news/2011/06/01/all-now-4th-poster-reveal
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Gang war
editIs it true that John shot Adam in a gang war? Should Adam be listed as a former member now? 129.78.56.205 (talk) 02:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
EE
editPeople could get through whatever, but I automatically insisted on Pre-2009 Kdramas.
Because males still have test-tube births out of "That's what my male networks do." 45.51.49.128 (talk) 21:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)