Talk:Swiss Leaks
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Swiss Leaks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 2015
editHello, I'm trying to improve the article but I don't know how to do it. So I'll put links that can improve it if you want to help me, please:
They are in "Complaints of journalism in Spain due of the lack of this investigation in tabloids and public broadcaster" https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Swiss_Leaks&oldid=646490271#Complaints_of_journalism_in_Spain_due_the_treatment_of_this_information
Thank you (I'm a newbie here) ;-P Regards.--Pantuflo (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't help you for the moment? Why don't you start an article about the event in the Spanish Wikipedia? Take care to stick to sources and do not add interpretation of informaiton by yourself to articles. This would harm the reputation of Wikipedia in the end.Luxsarl (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Seems like you're trying to address a completely different subject (journalism in Spain and its perceived shortcomings) using this article as a coatrack... --Randykitty (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- No, no, sorry, I only tried to relate that the treatment of an info itself could become a relevant fact (for example) and it could be relevant in many articles (or not). I'm a newcomer here, and my english is horrible hahah... :-P Edit: I've read WP:RECENTISM about recent articles in Wikipedia, It is useful before editing, better I'll edit other less recent articles, thanks. :-) --Pantuflo (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Prosecution of banking crimes should be in article
edit“So you might ask, what’s the appropriate financial penalty for a bank in HSBC’s position? Exactly how much money should one extract from a firm that has been shamelessly profiting from business with criminals for years and years? Remember, we’re talking about a company that has admitted to a smorgasbord of serious banking crimes. If you’re the prosecutor, you’ve got this bank by the balls. So how much money should you take?
How about all of it? How about every last dollar the bank has made since it started its illegal activity? How about you dive into every bank account of every single executive involved in this mess and take every last bonus dollar they’ve ever earned? Then take their houses, their cars, the paintings they bought at Sotheby’s auctions, the clothes in their closets, the loose change in the jars on their kitchen counters, every last freaking thing. Take it all and don’t think twice. And then throw them in jail.
Sound harsh? It does, doesn’t it? The only problem is, that’s exactly what the government does just about every day to ordinary people involved in ordinary drug cases.” [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kontrollinski (talk • contribs) 10:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)