Talk:Swift & Co. v. United States
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Swift & Co. v. United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 February 2021 and 21 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Nashley12.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Merger Proposal
editLook like identical articles. Should be merged.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed, I think the articles are the same. Merger is appropriate. Verkhovensky (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Absolutely merge. Can somebody who knows how to do this merge them? They are absolutely the same case. Techyactor15 (talk) 16:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
The Jungle
editHow could a novel published 4 years after the case was brought, and a year after it was decided, be the cause of public support for the decision? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lessig (talk • contribs) 13:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)