Talk:Swedish Institute
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge Curators of Sweden
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge Curators of Sweden
editCurators of Sweden should be merged to this article because both the articles are stubs and might be better off combined for navigating convenience. There is also a concern with the content as much of it is unsourced and trivial. I don't see why the article should remain. The editor whose username is Z0 10:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Curators of Sweden is not a stub, and even if some of the content is trivial, there's enough relevant information that it would dominate Swedish Institute in an unfortunate way. There's reliable sources to build on, over time and not just at one single occasion, and it passes WP:GNG due to non-trivial RS coverage. I'd say it works far better as a stand-alone article. /Julle (talk) 10:42, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)