Talk:Susan Crennan
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Queen's Counsel in topic Trivia Section
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Trivia Section
edit- Please do not remove information from the Trivia section without good reason. Thank you. Queen's Counsel 03:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Trivia sections are un-encyclopædic. Moreover, the source provided for the factoid is not reliable – it does not verify the claim. Although I don't believe it relevant, if a reliable source can be provided, I do not oppose properly integrating the information into the article (ie, in the text).--cj | talk 11:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- New source added. If the source was the problem, you should have said so. I have updated it accordingly.Queen's Counsel 09:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Trivia sections are un-encyclopædic. Moreover, the source provided for the factoid is not reliable – it does not verify the claim. Although I don't believe it relevant, if a reliable source can be provided, I do not oppose properly integrating the information into the article (ie, in the text).--cj | talk 11:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)