Talk:Sultanate of Singora
 | Sultanate of Singora is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 4, 2014. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Suggest move to Singgora Sultanate
editSultanate of Johor, Sultanate of Kedah and Sultanate of Malacca all 3 redirect to article titles ending in Sultanate. For now, I'm redirecting Singgora Sultanate here. —Pawyilee (talk) 07:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 06:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC) )
FFS lets not fight over a damn adjective... Comment
edit| This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
I've locked the page for three hours folks...can we just take a deep breath? I am going to bed and am happy for any other admin to unprotect the page if there is some discussion... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC) I'm not even on here today, I'm having fun with jazz piano, after all this is a website where the harder you work the more likely you're going to be targeted by nasty little trolls, isn't that right Singora? Was there really anything controversial about the changes made? Distance conversion is recommended for starters and I smartened up some of the short sections by putting them under what is all history.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC) @ Mr Casliber. I see that you are a psychiatrist. Take a look at the recent changes to this page and my talk page. I don't think I need to say any more. Singora (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC) If I was going to retaliate I'd have placed it at FAR, plastered tags all over it and insulted your work on it and called you something which Eric has said from time to time. I do think for a Sultanate article you need to cover administration and government and you should avoid short sections. I didn't make any extensive edits to your article did I? Does Casliber agree with Singora that this is vandalism? I still appreciate the effort you made with it, and I think given the time period it's highly likely that there's nothing more available for it. I just wish you'd return the respect for others who take articles to FAC. What you said on wikipedocracy was utterly disgusting. You don't know me, how dare you make comments like you did. We edit here and try to promote content for the same reason you did, passion for a topic and genuine will to help people. Not personal vanity. If we did we'd hardly edit for free and would spend our time on something likely to give us acclaim. Wikipedia is a thankless job and made worse by trolls. If you want to continue editing here start showing some respect to others and they might return it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC) |
New Sources RE: Forts
editThis:
Specifically:
Chapter 5: pages 1, 3, 5, 6, 7
Sources per Japan International Cooperation Agency, published 2002
1. Plan A. Re-jig forts section. Link to https://www.jstor.org/stable/41511012?seq=16#page_scan_tab_contents (JMBRAS 47; vol 1; page 28; mention of forts during archaeology dig). Re-write per Ministry of Culture excavations / restorations.
2. Plan B. Add Japanese sources only. 49.49.233.169 (talk) 11:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)