This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I think that the "Julie Driscoll, Brian Auger and The Trinity chronology" in the infobox is misleading. Judging from the cover images found via http://www.discogs.com/Brian-Auger-Julie-Driscoll-And-The-Trinity-Open/master/96710, none of the 1967/1968 LP releases of Open mentioned "Trinity". The term only occurs in images of CDs there, but there were no CDs in 1967/68. The covers have "Julie Driscoll" and "Brian Auger" listed, the LP had one side with Driscoll and one without her. And the "next album" in that "chronology", Befour is by Brian Auger & the Trinity, but Driscoll does not appear on it at all, so the term "Julie Driscoll, Brian Auger and The Trinity chronology" is wrong for that album, too. I suggest to remove the "Julie Driscoll, Brian Auger and The Trinity chronology" and only include a "Julie Driscoll chronology" with Open, Streetnoise and 1969. Any objections? The history of Driscoll's cooperation with Auger / the further development of Auger & the Trinity should rather go into the article text, IMHO. BNutzer (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
It makes perfect sense. But I suggest to take it a step further and also include a "Brian Auger chronology" with Definitely What, Streetnoise and Befour. WDYT? – IbLeo(talk)18:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Done BNutzer (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)