Talk:Stratford-on-Avon (UK Parliament constituency)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stratford-on-Avon (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Political history section - misleading/inaccurate text
editI think the text that states: "With the exception of a close 1963 by-election, the constituency has always returned substantial majorities for the Conservatives. The Liberal/Liberal Democratic parties came second in every election between 1974 and 2010. No other parties have broken the keep-deposit threshold of 5% of the vote." in the political history section of the article is misleading, if not outright wrong. It seems to me to imply only the Conservatives and Liberals/Lib Dems have retained their deposit. In fact Labour has always polled much more than 5% and in 2015 UKIP's candidate came second and had over 13% of the vote. I would suggest that this text should either be removed or edited to better reflect the actual electoral history of the Stratford-on-Avon constituency. Dunarc (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)