Talk:Stoughton, West Sussex
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge proposal
editGuidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Walderton to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ [[User:MortimerCat|MortimerCat])] (talk) 07:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC
- Comment - been little (well no) interest in merge, over 2 years old so I've removed the marge tag. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Layout
editPlease can someone help with the layout? Ref numbers and image are over-lappingSovalValtos (talk) 01:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Looks fine on my browser. (Firefox).Charles (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- I have put some extra blank lines in for now. I think it may be something to do with the images being in the non preferred left alignment, and the reflist in References aligning fully left.SovalValtos (talk) 10:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stoughton, West Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)