Talk:Stockton Street (San Francisco)

SPUR as a source

I made some revisions to the sections of this article which were based on a SPUR article from 2012. Because SPUR is an urbanist advocacy group, and as the article (essentially a recap of a SPUR-run visioning session) did not seem to meet encyclopedic standards. I did not remove all references, merely the once which seemed to be almost solely based on conjecture and SPUR's own urbanist slant.

However, I see that the edit was reverted by HaeB as a "factually reliable source." As mentioned above, because SPUR is an advocacy group, I do not believe that this is the case. There are any number of examples where SPUR has presented their opinions on a matter as the only objective fact - and this appears to be another of these cases. If SPUR were an academic organization, I could see an argument for keeping the characterization of the street and its (speculative) future in the article, but given their actual role, I do not think it is appropriate for this venue.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Painted house in Chinatown, San Francisco (TK).JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Painted house in Chinatown, San Francisco (TK).JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)