Talk:Still Life: An Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bruxton in topic Reception
 | Still Life: An Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 18, 2023. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Still Life: An Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life (pictured) includes a skull with missing teeth as a reminder of human mortality? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Article title
editNice work. Suggest Allegory of the Vanities of Human Life as title. Re the references, it would be better to put the books into a separate "sources" sect, and to refer in the inline notes to the page nr (eg Harrison (2020), p. 121). Ceoil (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Would describe in the lead as a Memento mori. Ceoil (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ceoil Thanks for the help, I will add you to the DYK. Regarding the title - I think this is the most common and brings back the most results. I will give the title some more research. Bruxton (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Bruxton, I was thinking more I'll review the DYK but my feeling is that while its coming along nicely, could do with another ce. Again, nice work. Ceoil (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Reception
editA section I always include when critique or reviews exist. I see how parts were deemed unnecessary so I have paired the section. I will also seek out other critiques. Bruxton (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)