Talk:Sticklepath

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Valid topic but right now it's a copyvio. Please re-write or else it'll get the copyvio tag. --Woohookitty 00:02, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Where has it been copied from? Biscuittin (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The original version of this article was a cut'n'paste job from http://south-zeal.com/bv/page063.html, which appears to claim (c) 2004. Even the sourcing to two books/leaflets was copied verbatim. Although it's possible that our IP editor was the same person who wrote the south-zeal.com pages, we couldn't be sure of this now even if he reappears (it was a dynamic IP address), so I've reduced this to a stub, pending a rewrite. The other 13 Jan 2005 contribs from 82.153.65.137 were presumably also copyvios - to be investigated. —SMALL JIM 17:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Courtenay family

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this section may be incorrect. Hugh de Courtenay was not born until 1248 so how could he have married in 1242? Biscuittin (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic