This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Talk:Stevns Klint is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
As Stevns Klint has just been added to the UNESCO World Heritage Lists, it would be great if someone with a background in geology could expand the article.--Ipigott (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
There's a huge amount of information in the paper "Stevns Klint, Denmark: Uppermost Maastrichtian chalk, Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, and lower Danian bryozoan mound complex" by Finn Surlyk and others in 2006, link here. I'll see if I can condense it down to something a bit more manageable. Mikenorton (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
That would be an enormous help, especially if you are able to re-express some of the technical terminology into a more generally meaningful level of language. I've looked at some of the technical papers myself, both in Danish and English, but am afraid I might make some disastrous errors if I attempt to rephrase them.--Ipigott (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
