Talk:Steven Pringle

A fact from Steven Pringle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 November 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that after resigning from the Australian Liberal Party, politician Steven Pringle used his parliamentary privilege to launch a scathing attack on the far right faction of the party for their alleged branch stacking tactics?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/November.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Steven Pringle is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

References

Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

There are numerous references in this article that are not verifiable through the web. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Uh, what? Rebecca (talk) 08:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Particularly a number of Sydney Morning Herald articles of the last 3 years. Normally these articles would be available on the web. Michellecrisp (talk) 13:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Um, no. The requirement is the articles be verifiable, not that someone who can't be bothered be able to access them in a click. This may include, y'know, going to your library and picking up a book, which generally makes for a good source. In this case, all of these articles can either be read with Factiva access, or down the road at your local library. I know that's a terrible amount of effort, but that's generally the way with writing an encyclopedia. Rebecca (talk) 10:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes and no. I didn't mean that every citation has to be web accessible on WP, but generally many SMH articles from last 5 years are on the web. Michellecrisp (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea. Either way, this has no bearing on the article's verifiability. Rebecca (talk) 23:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Steven Pringle/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Just some notes on my "B" class rating as the page history shows some differing opinions. The article is not at "A" class yet as(at the least):

it's missing any images
It's a biography article with little biographical information. Nothing about his life before university, date or place or birth
article does not have a lead per WP:LEAD
the parliment section focuses too little on his actions there and hence too much on the preselection battle.
Nothing about what he achieved in 16 years as a local councillor.

None of these detract from what is an interesting and well written article though - Peripitus (Talk) 05:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 03:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic