Talk:Steve Roach (musician)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 July 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Link to "Echoes" interviews
editI am restoring the link to the free "Echoes" interview page. This is an important reliable third party resource by one of the leading ambient music radio shows on US public radio, and it provides insights on the subject of this article that are, to my knowledge, not available anywhere else. --Gene_poole 21:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- When the host of the show, Jdiliberto, mass adds links, it is WP:SPAM and WP:COI) IrishGuy talk 21:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm adding them, and I'm not the host. If you can find an alternative series of interviews from an alternative free, reliable third party source, then please add them. --Gene_poole 21:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- (to Irish Guy) Not necessarily. WP:BITE and WP:AGF are also important guidelines, perhaps even more important than either WP:SPAM or WP:COI. Are the links relevant for the articles? If the links were added by any other user, would there be a problem? And besides, five links hardly constitute "mass" adding links. Each of the links was to different content that was pertinent to article. older ≠ wiser 21:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Pioneer
editI'm curious as to why Roach is described as a "pioneer" of ambient music. Is there a purely American context for the claim? If so, then the claim needs to be written as such. If not, then such references are POV and not founded in fact, as releasing a debut album in 1979 obviously proves. Yankoz
Peacock cleared
editThe page has recently been cleaned down to bare bone; any peacocks that may have roosted here (as the fossil record a.k.a. page history bears out) have clearly been driven extinct by now. I am accordingly removing the tag. Freederick (talk) 02:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Brilliant sentence
edit"His approach to ambient music has typically been beatless, although his rhythmic and trance-based groove and tribal-ambient releases are nearly as numerous as his more atmospheric releases."
So basically, he's only involved with beatless music. Except he does music with beats also. Glad we got all that squared away... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.236.201 (talk) 18:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Moar collaboration albums
edit- 1995 - Amplexus - Collected Works (with Vidna Obmana & Thom Brennan)
- 1998 - Imaginarium (with Ma Ja Le & Vir Unis)
- 2002 - Broken Voyage (with Kelly David)
- 2003 - Wachuma's Wave (with Byron Metcalf & Mark Seelig) - Created
- 2005 - Disciple (with Amaresh) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.59.44 (talk) 20:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
COI
editI removed the COI tag from the top of the article. Issue has been resolved; copyvio image was also deleted and I obtained new images that are free to use. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 06:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Reduced discography listings
edit...Looks less spammy this way. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Redirected from Atmospheric Conditions
editI am redirected from Atmospheric Conditions. Was that a bug? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.77.26.187 (talk) 23:05, 14 June 2018 (UTC)