Talk:Steve Armstrong
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 68.190.11.140 in topic Simple Question
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steve Armstrong article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Prod tag
editI removed the prod tag from this article, I intend to source it within the next few days, if I cannot find good sources I will personally put it up for AFD. MPJ -DK 09:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Now, you need to stop reinserting the material that you were not able to source. The burden of proof is on the person wanting to include the material. UnitAnode 18:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- And you need to stop misusing the rules and claim you're within your rights - I'm sure you were allowed to Prod however many articles you had on your list, giving you carte blanche to just disregard the "contentious" portions of the rules is highly doubtful. In fact "burden of proof" wise, it's on you to prove that you're "a special case" in regards to overapplying the rules of sources in BLPs. MPJ -DK 18:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- No, it's not. The burden clearly lies with the person attempting to reinsert challenged material. I've challenged the material, so source it, or it stays out. UnitAnode 18:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- you did not "challenge" the material - you just went "oh it's unsourced", apparently the definition of "contentious" has just been stretched to near breaking point. MPJ -DK 18:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm telling you right now, I challenged it. Either source it, or it stays out. UnitAnode 18:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- LOL that definition is about to snap, "i challenge it"... that's precious. MPJ -DK 19:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- "Precious"? Hardly. It's simply what is supposed to happen. I remove it (read: challenge it), and it's either sourced or stays out. UnitAnode 00:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- LOL that definition is about to snap, "i challenge it"... that's precious. MPJ -DK 19:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- you did not "challenge" the material - you just went "oh it's unsourced", apparently the definition of "contentious" has just been stretched to near breaking point. MPJ -DK 18:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- And you need to stop misusing the rules and claim you're within your rights - I'm sure you were allowed to Prod however many articles you had on your list, giving you carte blanche to just disregard the "contentious" portions of the rules is highly doubtful. In fact "burden of proof" wise, it's on you to prove that you're "a special case" in regards to overapplying the rules of sources in BLPs. MPJ -DK 18:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Simple Question
editWas Steve Armstrong was born in 1964 or 1965? I can't tell because in the box on the right it said 1964 but on the article it said 1965. It's probably appropriate to put a source under which birth year is correct. Minimac94 (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Consistency is key, I must have mistyped when I redid the info box, fixed with a source to verify which is right. MPJ -DK 18:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
hi are you to day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.11.140 (talk) 03:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)