Talk:Starfleet International Conference
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Redirect
editI've redirected this page. It is entirely unreferenced and there is no indication of or claim of notability. Ghits are SFI web sites, then this article, and then mirrors -- i.e. doubtful signs it has been covered by third-party sources. --EEMIV (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
John Bradbury
editIs there any rationale for listing John Bradbury as a guest, special or otherwise, at this event? To suggest that he matters in any way similar to the franchise actors or actual astronauts is laughable (or delusional). Furthermore, considering his close involvement with the fanclub, wouldn't his attendance be, I dunno, kind of expected? Unless he has some significance outside of the club, he doesn't warrant mentioning here. --EEMIV (talk) 17:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- He founded the club that later evolved into SFI but he hasn't been an active member of the organization in decades. His importance to the organization is unquestioned and that he's only been to two of these events illustrates that his appearance at one is of note, relative to this event. - Dravecky (talk) 19:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- I also want to point out that Bradbury's creation of STARFLEET (the legal name for the association) also lead to the establishment of several other Star Trek Fan Association, including Starfleet Command (which also claims Bradbury as it's founder) and the International Federation of Trekkers (which some of it's founding officers claim to be former members of STARFLEET). This is document on the "History of STARFLEET"[1] website, the narrative on the history of STARFLEET: The International Star Trek Fan Association.--Admhawk (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Can you substantiate any importance outside the club? If not, his presence is immaterial to the real/outside world and doesn't warrant inclusion here any more than any of the club's ex-presidents, -admirals, -deck swabs, etc. --EEMIV (talk) 20:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- He's not a fictional character. His importance in an article about a real event as a special guest of that event, as noted in the Charlotte Observer, is more than sufficient for the brief, properly-cited mention as it currently stands. - Dravecky (talk) 22:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Can you substantiate any importance outside the club? If not, his presence is immaterial to the real/outside world and doesn't warrant inclusion here any more than any of the club's ex-presidents, -admirals, -deck swabs, etc. --EEMIV (talk) 20:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Starfleet International Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090305102703/http://www.scribd.com:80/doc/12609684/Dragon-134-Dragons to http://www.scribd.com/doc/12609684/Dragon-134-Dragons
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Starfleet International Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721221235/http://sfi.org/MembershipCD/Communique/CQ130.pdf to http://sfi.org/MembershipCD/Communique/CQ130.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Starfleet International Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212222231/http://ic2008.org/ to http://www.ic2008.org/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205090011/http://ic2009.org/ to http://www.ic2009.org/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207203431/http://ic2010.org/ to http://www.ic2010.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Some trims and cleanup
editThe bulleted list is looking a little scraggly, so I tabularized it. It strikes me that the hotel venues are mostly clutter, so I didn't include them in the transformation. I also removed a paragraph in the main body that boils down to "COVID happened, so we canceled or deferred an event, and then did it the next year. And the next year. etc." --EEMIV (talk) 17:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Question re. notability
editJust going to ask this here: seeing as how the parent organization itself was merged into the broader Trekkie article, I do wonder the parent organization's event meets Wikipedia:Notability. I'm too disengaged with the broader Wikipedia to feel comfortable with a bold redirect these days, but I offer the nudge/question for folks with a better grasp of the current community's expectations for standalone GNG. --EEMIV (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)