Talk:Starbucks
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Starbucks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Starbucks. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Starbucks at the Reference desk. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | Pasqua Coffee was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 31 July 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Starbucks. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Adding new content to environmental practices section
editIt was recently announced that Starbucks and Mercedes-Benz teamed up to install electric vehicle (EV) chargers at Starbucks locations, supporting sustainability efforts and the development of EV infrastructure. Source. Is this a good piece to add to the environmental practices section? Bahooka or Villa503 Appreciate your thoughts. Haroldvandy2013 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Boycott amidst the 2023 Israel-Hamas war
edit"to sue the Starbucks Workers United (SWU) union for making a social media post in solidarity with Palestine" This only mentions the first part of what happened, but not the second. Which consequently gives a totally false impression of why Starbucks sued. The union in question posted a quote tweet that read 'Solidarity with Palestine' - yes that parts true. What context is missing is what they were quote tweeting: An anti-Israel account showing Hamas tearing down the border fence so they could invade Israel and proceed to massacre over 1,000 Israelis. Sentence should be re-worded to provide full context, instead of partial. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/s10bmni116
https://freebeacon.com/democrats/starbucks-union-championed-by-bernie-sanders-and-aoc-celebrates-hamas-attacks/ ChristofferItzakah (talk) 04:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. It is flat out false that to state SWU “[made] a social media post in solidarity with Palestine” when the post was over a picture of Hamas breaking into Israel on October 7. It should read “…social media post supporting Hamas.” https://apnews.com/article/starbucks-workers-united-union-lawsuit-israel-palestinian-f212a994fef67f122854a4df7e5d13f5 71.179.129.209 (talk) 01:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Boycott in the 2023 Israel-Hamas war
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change “[made] a social media post in solidarity with Palestine” to “…social media post supporting Hamas.” https://apnews.com/article/starbucks-workers-united-union-lawsuit-israel-palestinian-f212a994fef67f122854a4df7e5d13f5 71.179.129.209 (talk) 01:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done: I don't see anything in the source provided that supports the change. GrayStorm(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.) 02:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies. Here is another article with the actual original post: https://nypost.com/2023/10/12/starbucks-workers-union-voices-solidarity-with-palestine/
- The phrase “Solidarity with Palestine!” was over a picture of Hamas militants breaking into Israel on October 7 (I did not realize that was not explicitly stated in the AP article). The post was indeed in support of Hamas, and it is misleading to state over-wise. 71.179.129.209 (talk) 04:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. WP:NYPOST. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 17:21, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: Despite the article being semi protected, this edit request, should it be reopened, should be carried out only by an extended confirmed user per WP:ARBPIA. GrayStorm(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.) 02:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: the supplied source doesn't support the proposed change. M.Bitton (talk) 21:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- This source (https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/10/13/business/starbucks-israel-palestine-workers) clearly supports the claim. It states “The union, Starbucks Workers United, posted “Solidarity with Palestine” on social media platform X above an image of a bulldozer operated by Hamas tearing down a fence on the Gaza strip during the attacks against Israel last weekend” The SWU post was in support of Hamas. 71.179.129.209 (talk) 21:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: that's WP:OR. M.Bitton (talk) 01:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Organization and management
editOrganization management 112.206.76.10 (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Subject of Ransomware Attack November 2024
editStarbucks has been impacted by a ransomware attack. The attack was done on its Blue Yonder supply chain management software provider. The attack disrupted Blue Yonder's services, affecting Starbucks' payroll, staff scheduling, also affected other clients like Morrisons and Sainsbury's. Blue Yonder is investigating the breach but has not identified the attackers or provided a full recovery timeline. Reported by WSJ and others. [1] Mezaanx (talk) 11:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)