Talk:Star Trek (2009 film)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by DAP388 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rusted AutoParts (talk) 2:20 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I'll look at it.

Pros

edit

Cons

edit
  • The cast section should be merged. A section only for Supporting actors isn't WP:FILM standard. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 2:23 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Reception section - "Very positive" sounds a little juvenile. Perhaps "positive" or maybe this qualifies for "critical acclaim". Rusted AutoParts (talk) 2:26 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Reference 107 is a dead link. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 2:29 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • References 1, 2, 16, 17, 31, 35, 41, 43, 49, 70, 79, 84, 95, 101, 102, 118, 126, 128, 140, 142, 144, 157-173, 175, 179, 180 and 182 should be formatted to the rhythm of the other sources. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 2:37 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Marketing - "Abrams toured Rome; Cologne; Madrid; Paris; London; New York City and Los Angeles with 25 minutes of footage." Rather than list out every city, merge into "Abrams toured parts of Europe and North America with 25 minutes of footage." Rusted AutoParts (talk) 2:40 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • The pictures in the Cast section work, but maybe try to find a picture with all the main cast (the ones that depict the central characters on the Enterprise). Rusted AutoParts (talk) 2:42 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 
 

Ok. I say this is a pass. The links still need some adjusting, but that can easily be taken care of. Good job. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 14:05 12 January 2012 (UTC)