This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This was listed for proposed deletion on the grounds that the group are not notable. I am not sure how to argue otherwise other than to point to the text of the article itself. (I assume I was notified because I created the article. Which indeed I did, because I was listening to one of their commercially-released albums back in 2006 when I went to look them up here and found nothing, and thought that to be quite a shame!) It is true that they are currently on a reality TV show. But I would argue they have been notable for some time, between their Broadway run, international tours, and soundtrack albums. The folks at AFD may think differently, of course, but this at least deserves a debate. Kat Walsh(spill your mind?)04:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have no problem with the removal of the PROD. I'm not quick on the AFD trigger, so that won't be happening at my hand any time soon, but this article is in quite rough shape, and could use a good scrubbing, particularly in the way of referencing, use of sections, etc. I am not well-versed on these folks, so would you mind terribly placing some inline references and cleaning this up? LHM06:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
