Talk:Spy pixel

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 February 2021 and 15 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Luckyclover44. Peer reviewers: Penguinblueberry, Stellasuperba, CelticsFan3, 99rebound, Hotpink789!, LowIQPotato.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Bibliography

1. Englehardt, Steven, Jeffrey Han, and Arvind Narayanan. 2018. “I Never Signed up for This! Privacy Implications of Email Tracking.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2018(1):109–26.
2. Sipior, Janice C., Burke T. Ward, and Ruben A. Mendoza. 2011. “Online Privacy Concerns Associated with Cookies, Flash Cookies, and Web Beacons.” Journal of Internet Commerce 10(1):1–16.
3. Haupt, Johannes, Benedict Bender, Benjamin Fabian, and Stefan Lessmann. 2018. “Robust Identification of Email Tracking: A Machine Learning Approach.” European Journal of Operational Research 271(1):341–56.
4. Wirtz, Jochen, May O. Lwin, and Jerome D. Williams. 2007. “Causes and Consequences of Consumer Online Privacy Concern.” International Journal of Service Industry Management 18(4):326–48.
5. Brookman, Justin, Phoebe Rouge, Aaron Alva, and Christina Yeung. 2017. “Cross-Device Tracking: Measurement and Disclosures.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2017(2):133–48.
6. Melicher, William et al. 2016. “(Do Not) Track Me Sometimes: Users’ Contextual Preferences for Web Tracking.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2016(2):135–54.
7. fouad, Imane, Nataliia Bielova, Arnaud Legout, and Natasa Sarafijanovic-Djukic. 2020. “Missed by Filter Lists: Detecting Unknown Third-Party Trackers with Invisible Pixels.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2020(2):499–518.
8. Fabian, Benjamin, Benedict Bender, Ben Hesseldieck, Johannes Haupt, and Stefan Lessmann. 2021. “Enterprise-Grade Protection against e-Mail Tracking.” Information Systems 97:101702.
9. Farooqi, Shehroze, Maaz Musa, Zubair Shafiq, and Fareed Zaffar. 2020. “CanaryTrap: Detecting Data Misuse by Third-Party Apps on Online Social Networks.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2020(4):336–54.
10. Trevisan, Martino, Stefano Traverso, Eleonora Bassi, and Marco Mellia. 2019. “4 Years of EU Cookie Law: Results and Lessons Learned.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2019(2):126–45.
11. Leon, Pedro et al. 2012. “Why Johnny Can't Opt Out.” Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12.
12. Fourie, Ina and Theo Bothma. 2007. “Information Seeking: an Overview of Web Tracking and the Criteria for Tracking Software.” Aslib Proceedings 59(3):264–84.
13. Mughees, Muhammad Haris, Zhiyun Qian, and Zubair Shafiq. 2017. “Detecting Anti Ad-Blockers in the Wild.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2017(3):130–46.
14. Ringel, Daniel M. and Bernd Skiera. 2016. “Visualizing Asymmetric Competition Among More Than 1,000 Products Using Big Search Data.” Marketing Science 35(3):511–34.
15. Mittal, Sonal. 2010. “User Privacy and the Evolution of Third-Party Tracking Mechanisms on the World Wide Web.” SSRN Electronic Journal.
16. Stolfo, Salvatore J., Shlomo Hershkop, Ke Wang, Olivier Nimeskern, and Chia-Wei Hu. 2003. “A Behavior-Based Approach to Securing Email Systems.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 57–81.
17. Xu, Haitao, Haining Wang, and Angelos Stavrou. 2015. “Privacy Risk Assessment on Online Photos.” Research in Attacks, Intrusions, and Defenses 427–47.
18. Datta, Amit, Michael Carl Tschantz, and Anupam Datta. 2015. “Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings.” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2015(1):92–112.
19. Ansari, Asim and Carl F. Mela. 2003. “E-Customization.” Journal of Marketing Research 40(2):131–45.
20. Taylor, Curtis R. 2004. “Consumer Privacy and the Market for Customer Information.” The RAND Journal of Economics 35(4):631.

Luckyclover44 (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 22 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Merge to Web beacon. During discussion an alternative consensus has formed for a merge to Web beacon. The specific shape of the merge is an editorial decision and merging can be performed by any interested editor outside of the RM process per WP:MERGECLOSE. (closed by non-admin page mover) Raladic (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

---

Spy pixel → Tracking pixel – The proposed name seems more common, more neutral, and more formal. Note that tracking pixels (plural) redirects to a different article: Web beacon. I suggest the singular and plural terms should lead to the same article (this one). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

• Merge into Web beacon. The topics are basically the same, technology wise, and there seems to be a lot of content about web tracking in this article and vice versa. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

I have no objection to that (if someone will actually do the merge). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

• Rename to tracking pixels in HTML emails (or tracking pixels in email or some other variation), which seems to be the actual scope of this article. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

• Merge per Arnav Bhate, it does seem like the topics are inherently similar, although it will result in the majority of content at Web beacon to be about tracking pixels, and it adds a bit of length to the article.

Here is a revision where I merged the content in at the bottom and adjusted the headings to fit with the article, if a merge does go through you can feel free to restore that rev before requesting a histmerge to complete it.

No prejudice against renaming as suggested above as well, but I feel personally that a merge might be a better choice. ASUKITE 18:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

A merge does not require a histmerge. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I think I've been operating under that assumption for too long for some reason. ASUKITE 20:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.