Talk:Splitterskyddad EnhetsPlattform

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 14:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

---

{{movereq}}

SEP (Vehicle) → Spitterskyddad Enhets Platform — Per naming conventions. Falcon8765 (talk) 01:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

per what naming convention?
— V = I * R (talk) 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

• Oppose — IAW WP:COMMONNAME. All of the references currently in the article prefer to use "SAE".
  — V = I * R (talk) 06:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
• Comment - could the vehicle part be lowercased then? :) Falcon8765 (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

  I assume that you mean "SEP (vehicle)"? Yes, and it should be IAW WP:DAB.
  — V = I * R (talk) 23:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

• Oppose. Swedes combine words like crazy. The (grammatically) correct term for the vehicle would be "Splitterskyddad enhetsplattform" but this is a military vehicle and I'm sure they can do as they damn well please. / PerEdman 20:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Misspelled heading

"Spitter" is no word in Swedish, but "Splitter" (fragmentation, spall) is. Apparently there is a spelling error in the heading of one source or source document (probably the one on BAEsystems[1]) which has spread to several other sources. Some sources now spell the word correctly, with the L, while others leave the L out as in the press release from BAEsystems.

The word, however, is still "splitter", as in "fragmentation protected unit platform".  / Per Edman 22:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, could someone please move the article to Splitterskyddad EnhetsPlattform? 94.191.160.102 (talk) 15:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.army-technology.com/projects/sep/

  Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

• http://www.army-technology.com/news/news3888.html

  Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 21:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)