Talk:Spinner shark/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mattisse in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and have taken the liberty of doing some minor copy editing which you are free to change. The article is excellent. I have one question: Isn't all shark fishing illegal off the coast of Florida? —Mattisse (Talk) 20:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- No, both commercial and recreational shark fishing occurs off Florida, though certain species are protected. -- Yzx (talk) 21:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Very clearly written b (MoS): Follows MoS
- a (prose): Very clearly written b (MoS): Follows MoS
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): References are appropriate b (citations to reliable sources): They are from reliable sources c (OR): No OR
- a (references): References are appropriate b (citations to reliable sources): They are from reliable sources c (OR): No OR
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers the major areas appropriately b (focused): Remains focused on the article topic
- a (major aspects): Covers the major areas appropriately b (focused): Remains focused on the article topic
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
An excellent article. Congratulations!