Talk:SpaceX Mars colonization program

opposition to mars expeditions

Is there any serious opposition to mars expeditions? I am personally against any attempt to go to mars, not to speak to send humans, it seems to be such a really childish pursuit. Not particularly technically clever, just hugely expensive, an overgrown child dream like going to the moon or the space station. Plus the contamination issue. The most reveling justification is the one of the backup location for a specie which might be destroying the planet where it could live in harmony if it only would keep quiet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omblauman (talk • contribs) 17:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

What do you want to say with this Fehér Zsigmond-03 (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Why don't we live on earth first. The great desserts of Australia would be a great place to live. Lots of space, air, a road,predictable weather. People have, Woomera. Make desserts habitable. See if we can do it here before infecting somewhere we have no right to. 2A00:23C6:F680:2C01:E574:709E:9B4:C0 (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with improving the page's content. If any opposition goes beyond your personal opinions and is widespread or authoritative enough to deserve a mention on Wikipedia, then it should probably go on Human mission to Mars. Daydreamers (talk) 13:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Starship landing sites on Mars

Found an official document from the 2021 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference regarding SpaceX and JPL working together to select Starship landing sites on Mars: SpaceX Starship Landing Sites on Mars

Includes information on 22 potential sites and 4 primary sites. Anyone have thoughts on how best to incorporate this information into the article? Yiosie 2356 05:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Prior launch vehicle proposals

I split that section in a section for SpaceX Red Dragon and a section for the SpaceX Starship design process. That way, this otherwise specific second section can be linked to in a much more versatile, clear, standard and explicit way. It also makes it consistent with the Space Shuttle equivalent "Space Shuttle design process". Similarly to the Space Shuttle's, Starship's design process could deserve its own page — albeit it would be redundant on SpaceX ambition of colonizing Mars. What is the solution here? I do think this article is trying to do too many things at once, but I would also agree that the Mars Colonial Transporter design concept is relevant here. @User:CactiStaccingCrane CodemWiki (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

"SpaceX Mars propellant plant" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect SpaceX Mars propellant plant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § SpaceX Mars propellant plant until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 15:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

How really tall the SpaceX interplanetary transport system without the super heavy

SpaceX interplanetary transport system height 103.167.66.182 (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:FORUM

IIRC, 48 meters without booster, Redacted II (talk) 18:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

History of proposed Mars landings.

I feel like the history section is missing some parts of the history of proposed Starship Mars landings. While its good to have the current timeline proposal, this is definitely not the first time Mr. Musk has promissed a Starship mars landing within a couple years. If someone has the time/motivation to compile a more comprihensive summary of past Starship/Mars timelines, this page would definitely benifit. 138.246.3.72 (talk) 20:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)