Talk:Southern Cross (disambiguation)
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Move to "Southern Cross (disambiguation)"
editI think we should move Southern Cross to Southern Cross (disambiguation) and move Crux to Southern Cross. If there are no objections in a week I will do it myself.
My rationale is that it is in keeping with English Wikipedia policy to use the common English name as the name of the article. I have a started a discussion about this on Talk:Crux. If we could keep the discussion in one place it would be good.
Ben Arnold 01:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Crosby Stills Nash "Southern Cross"
editI tried adding a link to the song page Southern Cross (Song) but it is worded awkwardly. Is there a consistent way of doing this? Anyway, the stub of Southern Cross (Song) is meager but I'll work on it more this upcoming week. --Jpawloski 04:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
There's also a Southern Cross (song) which is completely different, and not on the disambig page. Does this violate some wiki policy, song vs Song? If so, can we rename the CSN one to Southern Cross (song CSN) or something? Anyone know how to do that? Simon12 21:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hi guys, I'm fixing these up now - using the names Southern Cross (folk song) and Southern Cross (Crosby, Stills and Nash song). -- Chuq 23:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Are you fixing the pages the links point to?Simon12 23:19, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, done - I've also redirected the (song) and (Song) pages to the disambig page. -- Chuq 23:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, you did in 10 minutes what would have taken me 2 hours!Simon12 23:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
asterism?
editasterism seems like an unusual term to use in a disambiguation page (rare term users are unlikely to be familiar with). We do have a wiki page for it asterism, so I tried converting the term to a link, but that was reverted. Should we just remove the term altogether then? Mathiastck (talk) 00:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's fine where it is. It's linked from the lead of Crux, which is the most common thing people are looking for. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- I still think asterism should be a prominent clickable link here. Mathiastck (talk) 21:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Heh well teh word asterism got removed anyway. If it is restored please make it a link :) Mathiastck (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- I still think asterism should be a prominent clickable link here. Mathiastck (talk) 21:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)