Talk:Son of Sardaar
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editAre you drunk man? some days ago,,,,we found that the budget of son of sardar was 80 crore,now it;s showing 30,,,,,why this miss news? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.127.24.116 (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Copying Violation
editNote: User Ghajinidetails is copying and pasting large sections of the Jab Tak Hai Jaan article. Please stop doing this as the information on that page is not even relevant to the information on this page. I have fixed all the copied material so please don't do this again or he will be reported. He also has a sockpuppet account under the name of Sanjeetbond that will be investigated shortly. Ashermadan (talk) 01:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC) Why editing has been blocked..is it due to SRK madfans who may vandalize it or what? I guess i M true. in No manner SOS could be more than 30 cror budget.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.151.3.2 (talk) 06:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 11 October 2012
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This movie Son of Sardar has landed up in controversy, being racial the movie official theatrical trailer has offensive dialogues and visuals, insulting and injuring SikhsLawyer and their religious sentiments. Senior sikh lawyer Adv Navkiran Singh from Chandigarh, sikh Lawyers from Nagpur Adv Jatinderpal singh and Adv Taranjeet Singh have taken objections and many other sikh organizations and individual sikhs have objected to the derogatory matter in movie and demanded its removal before release of the movie.
Wiseand wisdom (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not done You need source which states that the controversy took place. Torreslfchero (talk) 18:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Budget
editBudget is a concern.Hindustan times *[1] and ibn says 80 cr. The have huge diference.---zeeyanketu talk to me 05:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 19 November 2012
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Son of Sardaar Budget: Rs. 80 crore Number of screens booked: Around 1,700 Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Son-Of-Sardaar-review-by-Anupama-Chopra/Article1-958851.aspx.
Ganeshone (talk) 16:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Budget is a concern and have different figures from different websites.So its a worry.---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Partly done: Added information about Budget per source. The sources given on the current article are not reliable and one even agrees with zeeyanketu. Didn't add information about screens since it didn't seem notable. If you want this added, establish consensus first. Vacationnine 23:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 21 November 2012
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
<please give me permission to edit this page> Alex1786 (talk) 13:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC) The information about the son of sardar movie is not correct thats the reasion i want to edit.
- You can request that you can edit semi-protected pages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed. ⋘HueSatLum ? ❢⋙ 15:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- You can also edit after your account becomes autoconfirmed, which happens automatically after your account is at least 4 days old and you have made at least 10 edits. See WP:AUTOC. RudolfRed (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
December 8th, 2012 by MKS
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The film netted a total of ₹104.40 crore (US$13 million) in three weeks.[1]
References
Sandiplayek (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Also, there is a comment there saying to wait until near-end figures are announced. Otherwise, it creates confusion. Vacationnine 16:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Son of Sardaar india nett figures are varying by 16-17 crores.See this link:
http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07
Son of Sardaar nett grossed 105.03 crores. And Taran adarsh tweetsis a genuine sources.It has more than 2 lakhs followers on twitter,He takes data from production houses.,Even Ajay Devgan tweeted on Guru purnima day,Nov28,2012 Evening 4 PM that Son of Sardaar crossed 100 crores in india nett. you can check his tweet.some exceeptions can be made in wikipedia if Box Office India is changing its figures 3-4 times. this doesn't happens ,but basically after Golmaal 3it is changing drastically for these diwali releases. See these links:
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/youdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5133&nCat=
changed 75 cr to 69 cr for 10 days in india
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/youdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5139&nCat=
So please have conflicting reports in Son Of Sardaar also User talk:Abhinavname 05:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Box Office India has admitted that estimates made were wrong,But the logic is weird that the page content are sometimes deleted sometimes.
there is 16-17 crore differences as it stated only 88 crores for Son of Sardaar in 3 weeks in india.see thsi links
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5178&nCat=
and
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/youdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5145&nCat=
User talk:Abhinavname 18:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- Tweets are not reliable sources.They are changed because early figures are only estimates and it takes time to get near exact figures.Make some experienced users agree with you then you are welcome to insert them within the section.---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
{{Edit semi-product}} The story of "Son of Sardar" is very very similar to the Bengali movie "Fande poriya Boga Kande Re" which was released much earlier than SOS.
Mundane marketing
editIn this edit I removed the marketing section because it described mundane marketing efforts, which WP:TRAILER is not interested in. Every film on the planet is promoted through the use of trailers, posters, photo opportunities, actor spots on various television shows, interviews, etc. Not worth including. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Son of Sardaar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121101020118/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Editing-SOS-hasnt-hampered-creativity-Ajay-Devgn/articleshow/17037370.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Editing-SOS-hasnt-hampered-creativity-Ajay-Devgn/articleshow/17037370.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)