Talk:Someone to Watch Over Me (Battlestar Galactica)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
"It's all a dream!!!
editThere is no other explanation. The resurrection of Kara and the appearance and disappearance of her father clinches it. Everything going on is a simulation being run inside the mind of a Basestar Hybrid to determine whether or not the Cylon's plan to eliminate humanity is feasible. I think by the end, the answer will be in the negative, the Cylons will not attack, the Galactica will not be the last Battlestar, and life will go on as usual on Caprica with Cally finishing dental school.
The Eternal Squire —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.21 (talk) 04:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Whoa! The scary part is, they might actually do that. Perhaps its the end of the first war, and they captured some of them to test out what they'd do if humanity honored the peace agreement, and if they'd attack humanity again. Test to see if any would feel guilty later on, and how far they'd go before any had remorse. If they showed any reasonable remorse, and could be trusted not to turn in various situations, perhaps some could be saved. Or after determining they needed to wipe out all of them, keep it going, because it was such interesting television to the people, reminding them why their government was justified in ignoring the peace treaty, and nuking the heck out of the cylons on their new homeworld after they had all been gathered there. Maybe plant some bombs before they were given that planet. "See the scenarios? They would've done it to us, time and time again, in any situation, and hunted us to the last human left alive. There was no other way, but to get to them first." Dream Focus 21:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Caption
editUnder fair use policies images on articles need to be really well justified. Therefore an image should identify a key plot point and help increase the readers understanding of the plot. If we don't include all the details of the image in the caption it is not serving it's full illustrative purpose. According to WP:Spoiler "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." If somebody looks up this article they will be aware of the fact they will be spoiled, and often major plot points are included in the lead section of fiction articles, as the lead is supposed to summarise the whole article. Many may contain images that include an actual plot twist. For these reasons I have added the caption back in full. Million_Moments (talk) 17:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Understood. Tytrain (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)