Talk:Sol Levi/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I found zero disambiguations. Well Done!

Linkrot: I found zero dead links. Well Done!

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose) : b (MoS) :

   One thing, the lead is a bit messy maybe split it into two paragrpahs and maybe add a caption for the picture?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references are fine and no original research. Though there is no reception though looking on websites there isnt actually any which I can find either. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough and well focussed

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Maybe this is picky, on the development of Sol you could put a picture of Cole like with Vanessa Gold. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Every thing is good, so I am happy to list this as a Good Article. Congratulations! MayhemMario (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)