Talk:Sofia the First/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

I'll be picking this one up. This might be surprising, but when you have little sisters you know a lot about shows like these lol. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 01:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

• her widowed mother, Miranda, have – Correct me if I'm wrong but are the commas needed? (All I have done is looked over the lead, plot, and cast. So far looks great!)
  • To my knowledge, yes. Since Sofia only has one widowed mother, it's a, uh, something clause... wait *googles* apposition. (MOS:COMMA kinda explains it.) Pamzeis (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

  Haha and oh yeah! I think if I remember, they are also called something like nonessential and essential clauses. Looks fine to me though! ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 13:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

more to come...

• I must say relating to grammar, spelling, and that sort of stuff the article looks great! The only thing that sort of pops out to me is this All four seasons of Sofia the First can be bought on iTunes and Google Play. They can be streamed on Netflix, while the first season is available on FuboTV. It just seems a little bit promotional to me.
  • Thank you very much (especially considering prose isn't really my strong point)!
  • Rewritten that bit
• There are no sources for the cast and characters section
  • Per MOS:TVPLOT, such information does not require (a) reference(s) as it can be sourced back to the original work
• What makes MediaMikes and Epguides.com (seems like past discussions at WP:RSN say its not reliable) reliable?
  • MediaMikes: from their "About" page, the site seems to have paid staff. Mike Gencarelli, the founder of the site and writer of the article in question, has written for Dark Horizons, which was nominated for a Webby Award (considered "The Oscars of the Internet")
  • Removed epguides
• There are no copyvios, looking at the Earwig detector
• Spotchecks for refs 9, 12, 22, 25, 37, 44, and 53 are all good.

Hopefully, all  done.​ Pamzeis (talk) 10:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Looks good! ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 11:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed