Talk:Sofia Rosinsky
 | This article was nominated for deletion on November 22 2015. The result of the discussion was delete. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Recent coverage of Sofia Rosinsky
editWith this UPI article and this piece in The Wrap both specifically covering Rosinsky for her Paper Girls role, that combined with her awards for an earlier role should add up to the multiple noted roles that WP:NACTOR calls for. While I will not be adding this myself due to my retirement from article editing. I suggest that one or both of those sources be added and the notability tag removed. (In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I've had brief collegial contact with both her mother during the time of the initial deletion of this article and Sofia herself more recently, none of it rises anywhere near the level of setting a WP:COI concern. My suggestion here was not in any way requested or suggested by them.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Still unconvinced that notability is met here. WP:NACTOR claim is shaky, but that doesn't trump WP:BASIC which is possibly not cleared in this case. In two years, she might be clearly notable. Right now? I think the subject is borderline. I'll take a look at these two sources, though... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)