Talk:Smokie (food)
It is requested that an image or photograph of Smokie (food) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Africa may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Smokie (food) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Why they're dangerous
editThe article doesn't say (and I can't easily google) exactly why smokies should be so likely to be dangerous. The only reason I can think of is that the pre-sale blowtorching can cover up the rank and diseased condition of an animal (something you'd know about if you bought it raw). We need to find out, methinks. -- John Fader (talk | contribs) 00:51, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I've added a little bit of info about it but don't really know too much more. Do we know any West Africans here? violet/riga (t) 10:34, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I think there is also increased risk of BSE.
- I found some references, see: [1] and [2]. two BBC new reports -- 82.3.32.75 00:09, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
How does it taste?
editHow does it taste? How do people eat it? A food article has to answer these questions. Please tell us. -- Toytoy 03:36, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
- No idea! Never been anywhere near one! violet/riga (t) 10:34, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I imagine it would be something like lambs tails (traditional fare in new Zealand after lambs have been docked). Roasted over an open fire they taste pretty much like you'd imagine. Kind of like a burned jersey. Lisiate 01:38, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
U.K. or western world issue
editI guess the legal dispute is only a U.K. or western world issue. The consumption of smokie is very likely legal in Africa. We need to make this very clear. -- Toytoy 15:30, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
- It seems like that is the case, and I agree it should focus on the food itself before the legalities involved. Not knowing anything about it, however, I can't really expand that side of things. violet/riga (t) 15:33, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I cannot find a cookbook of it either. I don't even know how people call it in Africa. -- Toytoy 16:22, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
In North America I have only heard "smokie" refer to a smoked pork sausage. I notice that both Goodlife Foods and Oscar Mayer sell smoked pork sausages under the "Smokie" name. -- Corvus 00:56, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- There is another kind - Hillshire Farm brand of sausages. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 17:08, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Since the Hillshire Farm smokie is also a smoked pork sausage, I don't think it counts as "another kind". Corvus
- Now now, everyone remain calm, each of us has the right and duty to defend his favored sausage... I suggest we solve this like gentlemen... a duel is order! ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 30 June 2005 17:25 (UTC)
Smiley
editGod, that smiley thing sounds plain scary. Next time the kids hassle me to be taken for a Happy Meal, I'll get them a smiley indead ("See, it's a happy meal - it's smiling!"). -- John Fader (talk | contribs) 01:07, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delicacy??
editCan somebody clear something up for me..? I have heard that smokies are very favourable? If so does anyone know what they taste like and why they are such a Delicacy, is that why there are still available on the black market? Surely they must taste really good for people to still buy and eat them with all the health risks? I guess since not many people would consider eating one, will we ever have a good definition of what they taste like... :(
Why they are dangerous
editSmokies hav their skin and fur attached, and also include the head. The spinal column is left intact, as are the eyes and brain. These are designated as Risk Material, and carry a high incidence of prions such as BSE. As they are illegal, they are produced without the supervision of a Meat Hygiene Service Inspector, so quality control systems are non-existent. Furthermore, as some cash strapped farmers try to make a few bucks (no thanks to our government), the temptation to kill a few old sheep taht would otherwise not bring in any money is great, and such sheep are more likely to carry life threatening illnesses.
So, eat them if you want, but don't moan when your brain is turned to slush a few years on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.2.61.2 (talk) 18:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC).
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Smokie (food). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050415221817/http://db.bbc.co.uk:80/watchdog/reports/consumer/consumer_20050329_2.shtml to http://db.bbc.co.uk/watchdog/reports/consumer/consumer_20050329_2.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050425224259/http://www.fuw.org.uk:80/press_releases/2004_press_releases/eng_press_releases_109.htm to http://www.fuw.org.uk/press_releases/2004_press_releases/eng_press_releases_109.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)