Talk:Skmaqn–Port-la-Joye–Fort Amherst
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ivanvector in topic National Historic Site name change (move page?)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skmaqn–Port-la-Joye–Fort Amherst article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Historic Site name change (move page?)
editOn February 16, 2018, the name of the National Historic Site was changed from Port-la-Joye–Fort Amherst to Skmaqn–Port-la-Joye–Fort Amherst. I have changed references to the NHS in the text, but wonder if the page name should change (a move of the page). If this article is deemed to be primarily about the NHS, I advocate a change. If it's deemed to deal with the place itself, and only partially the modern creation of a NHS, there is an argument to keeping it as is. Thoughts are welcome. Yoho2001 (talk) 00:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oops, I already moved the page. Do you think it should be moved back? FWIW, I think it should be moved regardless of the scope of the article. The place itself and the historic site don't really exist separate from one another. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: I am fine with it, as long as links which connected to the old page are redirected (searches too), and no letters turn red. The previous name was already a conjoined one, using two historic names, which is as much a modern invention as the renamed NHS. Yoho2001 (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, there's a redirect at the old page title, so no links should be broken. Redirects are created automatically whenever a page is moved, except that some users can suppress the redirect in certain cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 07:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: I am fine with it, as long as links which connected to the old page are redirected (searches too), and no letters turn red. The previous name was already a conjoined one, using two historic names, which is as much a modern invention as the renamed NHS. Yoho2001 (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)