Talk:Sir Haydn (locomotive)

A fact from Sir Haydn (locomotive) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Talyllyn Railway locomotives No. 3 Sir Haydn and No. 4 Edward Thomas both hold the unusual distinction of carrying the same number through the ownership of four different railway companies?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/November.

Wikipedia

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Pronoun consistency

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Since we refer to Trojan as a "she", I feel like Sir Haydn should be referred to as a "he". Same with the Flying Scotsman. Booger-mike (talk) 23:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

LNER Class A3 4472 Flying Scotsman, to clarify. Booger-mike (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

No - all locomotives should be "it" - see WP:S/HE. Ships may be referred to as she, but even that is contentious. — Voice of Clam 05:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Including No. 10 in infobox

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@MayBunny37: Added Corris No. 10 to the infobox in this edit. I've reverted it, but I think you can make a reasonable argument that No. 10 is a modern member of this class, so should be included in the count of Hughes locos. On balance, I think it's cleaner and more correct to just include the original 3 Hughes locos, but can be persuaded otherwise. Thoughts? Opolito (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic