This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
Hi, i am only now seeing this is where you sought some discussion. I noted elsewhere that the 1936–1947 section consists of only one sentence, not needing to be split out, and the 1947-1955 section is very brief, too. I see your concern about the two infoboxes bunching up, but I think that should eventually be fixed by the 2 sections being longer, and placing the infoboxes in those sections. If it were split now the two articles might nearly be duplicates and readers would have trouble seeing any differences. Since the exact same map file appeared in both infoboxes, i removed it from the second one and expanded the caption on the first, just now. Having 2 maps suggests to the reader that there is some difference, IMO. Repetition of the identical area figures, however, helps readers see that there was no change. If it is true that there was no difference in borders between the two periods, then I tend to think it really should be kept as one article, with just one geographical section. The 1936-1947 and 1947-1955 sections should discuss any differences, such as change of capital and flag. They can mention that adjacent neighbors did change, including that West Punjab province came into existence in 1947, replacing whatever were the entity/entities that were neighbors during the first period. --doncram21:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
