Move?

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus. —harej (T) 06:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply



The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

If editors form a consensus that Azerbaijani names should be written with a Latin transliteration from what the Cyrillic representation of the name would be, and there is a standard transliteration used by authoritative English-language sources or WP editors agree on such a transliteration, then there is no problem keeping the article name where it is now. Absent such a consensus, however, WP:UE#No_established_usage prescribes the native spelling of the club's name. Moreover, the club was formed after the Soviet-era Cyrillic alphabet was disestablished, so in this case, there is no old Cyrillic form from which to transliterate. --Atemperman (talk) 18:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, it seems curious that the admin found there to be no consensus. Two editors supported the move, and two neither supported nor opposed it.--Atemperman (talk) 18:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good point. The easiest way to deal with it would be to reopen a move request. you could also try to appeal it at WT:RM but there is no formal appeals process and admins generally don't like their judgments questioned (though I'm not assuming this of User:harej per WP:AGF). I undid the no consensus move to Olimpik-Shuvalan to clarify the issue. — AjaxSmack 00:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Azal arena.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Azal arena.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Azal arena.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

History of AZAL PFC merged here

edit

I've merged and redirect History of AZAL PFC to here because I can't see a reason for the split. The article and section aren't big enough to warrant their own page. Plus (with a few changes) the content was copied directly over and there was not attribution. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on AZAL PFK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AZAL PFK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AZAL PFK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply