Talk:Short Mayo Composite

Take-off procedure

The article referenced by the link "Aero stories" states that the composite took off using only the carrier aircraft's engines; the Time article from 1938 states that all eight engines were used for take-off.

It is interesting in this context to note the caption to one of the images in the "Aero stories" article: "An aeronautical scene out of the ordinary: a flyingboat carrying a floatplane in "piggyback" fashion. Note that on this photo the Mercury's engines appear to be running." This would appear to confirm the Time article's version.

So which version is correct? TraceyR 00:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I have found an article (referenced from the page) which clearly states that all engines were used (and that the Mercury's controls were locked during combined flight). Mystery solved! TraceyR 11:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Designer

I note that we have Robert Mayo as designer in the infobox for both Maia and Mercury, did not Mayo just come up with the concept and not actually design the aircraft. Maia was a modified Empire boat design so I suspect was nothing to do with Mayo. Any comments ? MilborneOne 23:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

There's no real guideline for what goes into that field. Designer, mastermind, etc. works. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 05:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I put Robert Mayo's name in there because he was the driver behind the idea. I believe that he was the technical director/manager at Imperial Airways at the time (before joining Shorts?), although not the lead aircraft designer. Since the combination bears his name I have no problem with his name being deleted as designer, should you think it appropriate.TraceyR 08:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Short Mayo Composite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081118194510/http://www.borstal.org.uk/history/shorts.shtml to http://www.borstal.org.uk/history/shorts.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070413042855/http://iwn.iwai.ie:80/v28i4/flying_boats_foynes.PDF to http://iwn.iwai.ie/v28i4/flying_boats_foynes.PDF
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061018224014/http://www.imperial-airways.com/History_page_3.html to http://www.imperial-airways.com/History_page_3.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208155527/http://www.historyofaircargo.com:80/i-The-Short-Mayo-Composite-Mercury-and-Mai.html to http://www.historyofaircargo.com/i-The-Short-Mayo-Composite-Mercury-and-Mai.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927065546/http://www.gapan.org/about-the-guild/general-information/75-years-of-history/ to http://www.gapan.org/about-the-guild/general-information/75-years-of-history/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)