Talk:Shi Hu

Shi Zhi or Shi Kun was younger

Dear Nlu, you confirmed that Jinshu states that Shi Kun was youngest at the time among the surviving brothers (that excludes Shi Shi, murdered when he was 10 years old), Shi Kun was younger then Shi Zhi, and that is the source that we rely on. Please explain why "it was basically impossible; it was clear that Shi Shi was younger", and provide justification for it. There must be a good reason to say that Jinshu is wrong. I think this is just a minor misunderstanding, you would agree the sequence should be Shi Zhi - Shi Kun - Shi Shi. Thanks, Barefact (talk) 05:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

If that were what you're referring to, I have no quibbles with it. I am just stating that the text should not state that Shi Kun was the youngest (since, again, Shi Shi was clearly younger). I have no opinion as to Shi Zhi. --Nlu (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Barefact (talk) 18:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

SHI Hu, Murong Huang and Murong Ke.

There is possibly an error with these articles in that Murong Ke would only have been 7 years old at the time of the Later Zhao attack and seige of the Murong capital of Jin cheng in 338AD. Edward Hudspith (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)