Talk:Sherwood Foresters

First comment

During WW2 the 14th Battalion Sherwood Foresters were stationed in Egypt, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. Palmiped 13:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SF ColourRegiment.JPG

Image:SF ColourRegiment.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Unscholarly and curious tone of this piece.

This piece is written in a very curious, mock Victorian tone. Could somebody who has some time possibly re-write it into something more scholarly and less, well, gushing? 220.233.178.130 (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyvio?

It looks as if this page has been lifted verbatim from the History of the Sherwood Foresters website, so unless that one is copied from here, this whole page will have to go. Does anyone know the provenance of the content here? Xyl 54 (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

[1], 2007. No other contribs from the user - it does indeed look like a clear lift, since that site's last dated 2001. Shimgray | talk | 11:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

What happens now? Is there a time limit to sort this out? Or a template or something? (I seem to remember). Should it be deleted and replaced with a re-written article? or even a stub, for now. We've got articles on the 45th and 95th already, so they need a summary here and a main article link, and text here for the regiments history from 1881 to the present; or to 1970 anyway.. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

PS Found it! Xyl 54 (talk) 23:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

(outdent) OK, I've deleted the plagiarized material (which didn't leave much!) and I've added a brief account of the regiments history. I trust it will do until it can be expanded. Xyl 54 (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

1755 or 1823?

See 95th (Derbyshire) Regiment of Foot. Sources seem to be at variance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk • contribs) 10:28, 14 April 2011

You're right...I've fixed it. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Battalions raised

Although regiments.org lists 33 battalions as taking part in WW1, only 25 of these were raised during the war - 8 Btns (regular, militia and TF) were in existence several years before war commenced!

Similarly, at least 6 Btns (1st - 5th and 8th) existed prior to the start of WW2. The 7th btn had converted to an RE searchlight unit in 1938, the same might have happened with the 6th btn. The order to duplicate the TA was issued on 31 March 1939 and the majority of TA units seem to have managed this duplication before September. I'm not sure if this was the case for 2/5th and 2/8th Btns (although the latter was seemingly re-designated as the 9th btn at some time during 1939).Glevum (talk) 01:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

existed btns (3rd & 4th) and the territorial btns (5th, - 8th) this includes

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sherwood Foresters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/045SherF.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080110025226/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/laa/page143.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/laa/page143.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304041131/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/home/page49.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/home/page49.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319184727/http://freespace.virgin.net/stephen.mee/index.htm to http://freespace.virgin.net/stephen.mee/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090322060614/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)