WPMILHIST Assessment

edit

A fine start, but that last section hurts my eyes. Please reformat that into a bulleted list, table, or something else that's easier to make sense of. LordAmeth 16:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Cefcap117.jpg

edit
 

Image:Cefcap117.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Michael Wittmann

edit

Shouldn't this article expand to cover the claim that one of the tanks in the unit killed Michael Wittmann ? 76.66.193.224 (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think the updated summary is sufficient. I added a citation to the most recent publication on the SFR's role. The Wittmann article is the place to go into more detail.Dan Conlin (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move Second World War Content to Sherbrooke Fusilier Article?

edit

There is a major overlap between the Second World War content of this article and the Sherbrooke_Fusiliers_Regiment article. Wouldn't it make more sense for this article to focus on the present day Hussar unit , with summaries and links to its predecessor units, and transfer the WW II details to the Sherbrooke Fusilier article? Dan Conlin (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply