Semiaquatic is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In the first paragraph there is a single word (macroorganism) that someone has made into two links: one for "macro" and one for "organism". I don't think this is helpful, because if someone wants to know what a macroorganism is, they won't be able to find out by clicking either of these conjoined links.
I understand there is not currently a Wikipedia article for macroorganism, but I think the present solution is flawed, because learning what "macro" and "organism" mean separately (by clicking on the respective links) will not lead a reader to an understanding of what macroorganism means ("an organism large enough to be seen without a microscope").
Perhaps we can de-link this word, and instead put it in double-brackets, until someone writes an article for macroorganism? Leaving it the way it is now just points readers to two words that are at best tangentially relevant, and at worst, distracting. Thanks and happy editing. Chillowack (talk) 20:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
