Talk:Semantic wiki

Computing: Software / Websites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Low-importance).

First mentionings of the term 'semantic wiki'?

Private email from Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:01:04 +0200 by Brevity 15:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Alternatives

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Is anyone aware of discussion within the semantic wiki community on adding markup to wikipedia and then writing external software that uses wikipedia's data to do the same, rather than just recreating the wiki?

Gokmop 18:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be asking three different questions at once? I believe adding markup to Wikipedia pages won't gain support until Wikipedia itself understands the markup. It would be nice if Wikipedia ran an extension like Semantic MediaWiki; meanwhile, standardization, categorization, consistency, and most importantly use of templates and infoboxes all help humans and machines to discern semantics in Wikipedia articles. DBpedia.org is nifty external software that extracts structured information from Wikipedia pages. -- Skierpage 07:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the DBPedia link - that's not far off of what I was looking for. I wasn't suggesting adding this markup to wikipedia itself, since the computability of this stuff is pretty far outside the scope of what wikipedia is supposed to do. I was thinking more of using the information that wikipedia already provides, and then adding on top of it in a separate dataset, which after a cursory glance, it looks like DBPedia may be doing. What seems silly to me is creating a new semantic wiki with a new page for something like "Akron, Ohio" that doesn't start with everything Wikipedia already has on the subject. Gokmop 20:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please contribute here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/infobox_template_coherence, we are trying to create markup in the form of template annotations. There is a direct benefit for Wikipedia right now with just minimal changes. Later as Wikipedia users understand the advantages of having more structure, Semantic Media Wiki could be picking up the trend. SebastianHellmann (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic