Lead

edit

The last sentence of the read states that none of the characters were played by Jim Henson. But so what? Before that, there's no mention of Jim Henson at all, neither in the lead nor the infobox, nor any company with which he was associated.

While the sentence could stand, I think therefore it needs qualification here to suggest why it might have been. i.e. the fact that it wasn't (cos he was dead) is only relevant because he might otherwise have been. I don't think, as it's written, it stands on its own feet as an exception that proves the rule.

The current wording was introduced by this series of edits.

Comments? Si Trew (talk) 17:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I wish I could have that robot named Bleep from the 1986 The Christmas Toy

edit

I wish have have that robot named Bleep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.90.226.122 (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply