Talk:Scott McCloud

Untitled

I think Scott Mccloud's wikipedia entry deserves a lot more attention. -Sam

The "quote" referencing cave paintings is erroneous. I do not believe Scott McCloud ever said cave paintings were comics. Where did this information come from? Citation?

Have you noticed that "Making Comics" directs to here? Perhaps not a problem, but if not, we should remove the link to "Making Comics." It's silly to have a page link to itself.

Scott McCloud and Kurt Busiek

There's no mention of the fact that Scott McCloud (still can't get used to that spelling) was a childhood friend of Kurt Busiek and that they created near-professional quality comic books together in high school. I'd add it, except for the fact I can't cite supporting materials. I went to high school with them, so I have direct knowledge of this. Scott & Kurt were obviously both prodigies and I think that's relevant, but I don't want to violate the wikipedia policies on citing sources.

Ct4ul4u (talk) 00:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I think you can find this in lots of places. Scott's afterword to Marvels mentions it, to my recollection. I think Scott may even talk about it in one of his ~ Comics books. Probably something in the collection of Zot!, too, although I have none of these books with me at the moment (moved to a new city, didn't take much with me). Just check these books if you have em, I'm absolutely certain you'll find something in one of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.146.36 (talk) 03:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Scott McCloud and Penny-arcade

Something should be in here about Scott McCloud's fight with PA or at least some criticisms of his work.
69.106.203.87

I have to agree with this. After all, it wasn't simply a "vanity fight" over most page hits or the highest popularity, but it was based on differing outlooks with regards to the medium and future of webcomics (inspite of the petty insults). And a few other prominent webcomic creators, such as Kurtz got involved in it, too, which made the webisode (ha! geddit?) all the more notable. 85.72.166.21 18:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Family and last name

Should we mention that he is married and has a family, and that his last name was Anglicized to the current one, though it is pronounced the same way (the current article is modestly misleading on this point)? -- Gwern (contribs) 21:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

I always wondered if his name had anything to do with Fox. :P Shay Guy 00:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I asked him about that, and alas, it does not. :( --Gwern (contribs) 01:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

The names of his two daughters are Sky Mcleod and Winter Mcleod and he is married to Ivy Ratafia. An interesting respelling of the name. --75.82.226.104 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:POV, "Scholar", uncited statements.

• I removed several comments that represented a point of view of the editor ("popular", "most ambitious", "widely considered", etc...).
• From the information in this article, Mr. McCloud would not qualify as a "scholar". His writings represent a personal point of view, rather than an amalgamation of information based on a founded basis of non-partisan research. I found the qualifier "theorist" used elsewhere on this page to be much more aplicable and have edited the statements refering to Mr. mcCloud as a scholar to match.
• I am tagging this page as containing uncited statements, please see inline citations I added.

LeilaniLad (talk) 14:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Removing "citations missing" tag

I've removed the "citations missing" tag since there are seven citations in the article already. If there are specific parts of the article that need citations, please tag those specific parts or draw attention you concerns here on the talk page. --Dragonfiend (talk) 21:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Making Comics redirect

Does anyone else realize that Making Comics redirects here? That probably should not be like that.--Mynameisnotpj (talk) 02:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

• Until someone writes a Making Comics article, the redirect makes sense. --Dragonfiend (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Awful Paragraph about McCloud's theories

I haven't read Understanding Comics in years, but I'm still virtually certain that the below is a mistake:

"For example, he addresses how time in a comic frame is supposed to be seen as multiple variations of time where several things are happening at different moments in the same space. However, readers go through comics and don't realize that more than one moment in time has been occurring; this frustration is shared by McCloud and many other artists."

This is absurd, from what I know of McCloud. He would never limit what could happen in a single frame. Certainly, he points out that a single frame can contain more than one moment, but he doesn't say this of every panel. There are frames where only one moment is occurring, and readers are thus right to think that only one moment is occurring. This silly interpretation of McCloud is not cited so there's no way to check that McCloud never said this. But nevertheless I am confident it is mistaken. Furthermore, if what I say here is right, then McCloud feels no frustration about the phenomenon, as it is a non-existent phenomenon. And just who are these 'other artists' who agree with this fictional McCloud?

"He also emphasizes how readers are so used to reading in a left-to-right or up-to-down direction that they start to feel as if comics are a linear medium, when in reality, readers have the option of changing the direction of what they are reading. In this day and age, people are conditioned to read in a left to right, concrete fashion. Throwing them outside of this programmed path confuses people. They are not used to the fact that, as a reader, they have choices in which direction they would like their comic story experience to go."

Um, again, what? I don't think McCloud says that you can read a story right-to-left if it has been written left-to-right. I mean of course you can, but I don't think McCloud advocates this. On the contrary, in Making Comics McCloud talks about a good comic story being a clear one -- reading panels in the 'wrong' (or 'unintended') order would certainly be a barrier to acheiving this goal. Now he might be a bit more flexible with writers -- he may inform them that they can write right-to-left if they wish (and certainly, in regards Manga writers, he definitely endorsed this), and he may have even told writers that they can experiement with the expected flow of a comic (e.g., left-to-right' in an American comic), but even so I'm sure he would have said it with a note of caution. He'd probably admit that Alan Moore's Promethea #33 shows that comics with an unusual flow can work, and I know his webcomics play with flow, but in both cases the authors have been very careful that the readers don't read anything in 'the wrong order' (Moore did this by making every which way the 'right way,' and I think McCloud does it by arrows). Nowhere does McCloud say that you can just pop out a copy of, say, Amazing Spiderman and just have the whole thing run from bottom to top or something like that. Actually, that might be kind of cool, but again you'd probably have to put a whole heap of thought into how that was going to work for readers, because McCloud is quite big on clarity.

I think you're misreading the paragraph. It's pretty straightforward: because past Western artists have stuck to very simple layouts, people and future artists are blinded to the other 2D paths/layouts. McCloud definitely does have a section where he discusses how there are many many possible layouts, gives a few examples (like the multiple-outcome one about ice cream & videos), and IIRC also mentions how Japanese manga tend to use a different layout than left-right or up-down. I read UC a few days ago, and that section, at least, is poorly written but I wouldn't say incorrect. --Gwern (contribs) 14:30 4 January 2010 (GMT)

Hi Gwern:

Certainly McCloud would agree that there are many possible layouts to a comic, but there’s a difference between layout and flow. A six-panel grid and a nine-panel grid are different layouts, but both can have the same ‘flow’ (left-to-right and down the page). Perhaps ‘flow’ is a term he introduces in Making Comics, but I hope this is informative as an introductory remark.

Now I’ve also no doubt that McCloud says that comics can have unusual flows. I don’t know if your ice-cream example is an example of differing flows or differing layouts, but certainly he says that Manga has a different flow than Western comics. But in this case that’s only because Japanese writing has a different flow than Western writing – that difference has merely been tranlated to Manga. So Manga isn’t an example of unusual flow either. But as I say above, McCloud’s own webcomics (and, on the more extreme end, Moore’s Promethea #33) are examples of unusual flow. With these things clear (a necessary move, I think, as you and I have different McCloud diatribes fresh in our heads), I will move onto the substantive point of your comment.

I think you’re arguing that McCloud’s endorsement (?) of the above type of comics justifies the wiki-writer’s contributions. But as I say in my earlier post, there is surely a difference between a writer intending that some comic be read up the page and a reader getting to choose whether they read up the page. As far as I am aware, McCloud has never endorsed the latter, and if he did I have no idea where he did so (as the wiki-writer gives no reference). And it is certainly the latter that the wiki-writer attributes to McCloud:

“as a reader, they have choices in which direction they would like their comic story experience to go” and “readers have the option of changing the direction of what they are reading.”

This is incorrect: only in some cases (perhaps Promethea #33 is the best example) can the reader choose (in any significant sense) which way they want to read the comic. And in this case it is only because the writer has allowed them to. I think that even in McCloud’s own experiments with flow, the reader doesn’t get to ‘choose’ which way they want to read the story: they’ve got to read certain panels after other panels, even though the flow is unusual. The writer basically gets to decide which way one reads a comic, whether that is up the page, down the page, or all around. In fact, after reading Making Comics, I think McCloud would be aghast at the suggestion that the reader (in the general case) gets to choose which way he/she reads the comic. He talks about being careful how you write your comic, so that the reader knows which panel to read next. Left-to-right and down the page (unless you’re doing something experimental) in a Western comic is the way to go!

I think that the wiki-writer has certainly misread or misrepresented UC (and almost contradicted MC), but I’m not sure whether you have done so as well or if you have just liberally interpreted the wiki-writer’s comments. In any case, I’m fairly certain that McCloud does not say you can pick up any old comic and read the panels in any order, and this is specifically what the wiki-writer attributes to McCloud.

But anyway, now that it’s all been removed, the whole article reads a lot nicer, and I think on this you agree, so at the moment it’s probably best to just leave it, I think.--203.45.146.36 (talk) 02:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

So, in short, an awful, awful, awful paragraph -- and the fact that the above has been included but interesting facts like the reception of 'Making Comics' are nowhere to be found is very perplexing. I'd delete the whole paragraph, if not for the fact that I'm always reluctant to just delete something without putting something else back in its place. But I'm not sure what to put here -- to what are the authors referring? There's no indication. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.146.36 (talk) 03:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC) --203.45.146.36 (talk) 03:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

The edit where the material was introduced was [1] by Nptl.12 (talk · contribs) [2] by Rz1115 (talk · contribs). They both seem like unsources POV to me. Further they do seem to miss-represent "Understanding Comics" imposing a particular interpretation. For now I'm remove it. (There is a feeling that section this may actually refer to "Reinventing Comics" rather than UC). --Salix (talk): 15:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Great -- and by all means put it back in if it can be sourced, but I just really doubt it can be. Reads a lot nicer, thanks.--203.45.146.36 (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

File:ScottMcCloud.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:ScottMcCloud.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Suggested edits

I am not going to edit this page directly due to WP:COI concerns (I have both a personal and a business relationship with McCloud, including being a publisher of the book 24 Hour Comics listed in the biography), but I am going to suggest some corrections and expansions that other editors here should consider putting in:

• Either Early life or at the beginning of Artist and theorist, it should include: During his high school years, he collaborated on comics with his schoolmate Kurt Busiek. While still teenagers, the two of them, together with fellow teenagers Christopher Bing (a 2001 Caldecott Medal winner) and Richard Howell, created the first licensed Marvel/DC crossover comic Biff! Bang! Pops!, a one-shot sold in conjunction with a 1978 Boston Pops performance of comics-themed music.
• In Artist and theorist, it should include that he had a job as a production artist in DC Comics while he developed Zot!, but I don't have a convenient source for that.
• Personal life: McCloud has not lived in Newbury Park for years now; this should be reduced to just "California".
• Awards: Should add 2007 Quill Award for Best Graphic Novel for Making Comics
• Awards: Nominations: Should add 1994 Hugo Award for Best Related Non-Fiction Book for Understanding Comics

--Nat Gertler (talk) 16:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Richard Howell was a New Jersey Governor who died in 1802. He was long dead by the time Biff! Bang! Pops! was published. Richard Howell (comics) was the person who drew said crossover. Mtminchi08 (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I did just edit to flag a dead link... but am avoiding substantive edits. Still "Finally, in 2006, he released Making Comics."? That's final? McCloud is never going to do another work of comics theory or practice again? Sounds presumptive. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

References

Good source to use

See here This is an excellent interview about his influences. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scott McCloud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071128143552/http://web.mit.edu:80/newsoffice/2006/mccloud-0920.html to http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2006/mccloud-0920.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scott McCloud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319194942/http://archives.tcj.com/2_archives/i_mccloud.html to http://archives.tcj.com/2_archives/i_mccloud.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scott McCloud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.scottmccloud.com/4-inventions/24hr/phenomenon/index.htmlindex
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111101190330/http://www.comic-con.org/cci/cci_manning.php to http://www.comic-con.org/cci/cci_manning.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

A couple quick editing notes

I've got too much WP:COI with Scott to go in and make these adjustments myself, but someone else should look at them and consider implementing the changes.

• McCloud maintains an active online presence on his web site where he publishes many of his ongoing experiments with comics produced specifically for the web. - given that it isn't really active at this point (last blog post just shy of two years ago), perhaps rework this to On his website, McCloud has published many of his ongoing experiments with comics produced specifically for the web.
• He married Ivy Ratafia in 1988, with whom he has two daughters, Sky and Winter. Given that he had the daughters with Ivy, not with 1988, this should be In 1988 he married Ivy Ratafia, with whom he has two daughters, Sky and Winter. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

I've made the second change, and also removed the names of the daughters. No obvious harm in it, but I think it's best to air on the side of caution for WP:LPNAMEs. Grayfell (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

"Writing"

@Delectable1: In this recent edit, you changed the description of the process of making comics to "writing". This is inappropriate. "Writing" is simply about words; we may describe a filmmaker as "writing" when they work on the script, but that's only a part of making a film. Someone who has "written" a song has provided score and lyrics, but not performance. In comics, we use "writing" similarly to that; if one is creating a script, one is "writing", but when making the non-text visuals, that's "drawing". We refer to providing both words and images as "cartooning" or (as McCloud himself has notably used) "making comics". There are indeed comics works that McCloud should be said to have written (his Superman works), but that does not apply to his key non-fiction works, nor Zot!, The Sculptor, etc. While I have a conflict of interest in regards to Scott, I recommend that you )or someone else) review your changes and undo at least that portion of them. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

"Ivy McCloud"

The "Personal life" section currently has a reference to "Ivy McCloud"... which was never her name. Remember, "Scott McCloud" is a pen name, or at least a pen spelling. Ivy's last name was McLeod, and when she contributed to Scott's work on Zot! (and I believe elsewhere), she used her maiden name, Ivy Ratafia.

I have some strong conflicts of interest with regard to the subject of this article, but I ask that other editors review this concern and, if deemed appropriate, reduce her name simply to "Ivy" in this instance. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Done. I've also reverted the recent edit mentioning that one of the kids went to college, since this was in 2011 and seems too trivial. The comment about voice-over work didn't appear to be supported by the source. Grayfell (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)