Talk:Scott Greenstein
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Thivierr in topic remove of positive material
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Text which is described in the OTRS ticket. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009052010070049. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Untitled
editE-mail has been sent from copyright holder to Wikipedia confirming permission to re-use the material in the Scott Greenstein page.
- This page keeps getting re-created through cut and paste over and over. Why not simply write an entry yourself? It's not hard, and you'd get a better article. Please note that there is a procedure for donating copyright, and it involves more than simply sending an email. See: Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Hairhorn (talk) 21:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- OTRS has received an email from the copyright holder to release this material under the GFDL. As such, I've restored the article text. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC).
remove of positive material
editI've removed some positive material, for being unsourced. I feel if we remove material that's negative for being unsourced (as we must), we should (though we don't have to) do the same for positive material, in order to be balanced. --Rob (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC)