Wikipedia

Talk:Scotiabank Saddledome

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleScotiabank Saddledome has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 4, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Name

edit

I'd favour renaming this article "Saddledome". No one cares which company currently owns its naming rights. -- Anon

Well, it's always dangerous to say "no one" but I take your point. On the other hand it is pretty widely known as the Pengrowth Saddledome even though many people (including myself) had no idea that Pengrowth was the name of a company -- at least I didn't until I read your note above. Derek Ross | Talk 19:13, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)
Officially it is named Pengrowth Saddledome so that is what it should stay. There is precedence in many other arena articles. --Djsasso 19:19, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Yes and no. The trouble is that that official name could change tomorrow (as it has in the past). It's too temporary. The only part of the name which doesn't change as the years go by is the Saddledome part of it. Other arenas may need the corporate sponsor part of the name for disambiguation purposes but as far as I can see there's only one Saddledome... -- Derek Ross | Talk 19:27, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)
Checking into it a little further, the Saddledome is actually run by the Saddledome Foundation whose board members include representatives from Calgary, from Alberta, from the Olympic committee, from the Canadian Hockey Association and from The Stampede Board. There is no representation from Pengrowth though. -- Derek Ross | Talk 19:39, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)
Yes it could change tomorrow and at that time there should be a name change. Thats sorta what wikipedia is good for. Changing when things change, unlike a printed version. It doesn't change enough that its ever really an issue. Usually they sign contracts for such things for many years. For example it was supposed to be the Canadian Airlines Saddledome for like 15 or 20 years I forget the exact amount. Only reason it changed to Pengrowth was that Canadian went belly up. --Djsasso 22:13, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Article name change

edit

How do you change the name of the article to "Saddledome".......calling it the "pengrowth saddledome" is ridiculous, nobody will type into the search engine "pengrowth saddledome" --Vega007

I am against moving this page. However, if you want instructions to do this see Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page. I have created a redirect so that if anyone searches on "Saddledome", they come to this page. This addresses the search problem you noted. I am surprised that no one created this redirect before now. --JamesTeterenko 05:42, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
well i think a redirect is perfect, good job, no need to change the article name now, thanks -vega007
I had actually thought I already had...wierd...I must be getting old. --Djsasso 04:59, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Semi-protection...

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

...is required for this article. Due to the incorrect changes to Scotiabank Saddledome. GoodDay (talk) 22:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Semi protection is not for good faith changes, even if misguided. Nor is there nearly enough misleading edits to justify it. Resolute 23:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Irrelevant info

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago9 comments4 people in discussion

That other arenas are sponsored by Scotiabank seems to be at best tangential to this arena. Dbrodbeck (talk) 03:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yup. And the fact that companies sponsor multiple stadia is likewise hardly unique. Rogers Centre/Rogers Arena, Enmax Centre/Enmax Centrium, Credit Union Centre/Credit Union iPlex, There are two Toyota Center's and a Toyota Park. American Airlines Arena/American Airlines Center, and that's just off the top of my head. Ultimately, this article is about the building, not the sponsor. Resolute 04:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Now, would those be Toyota Centres, or Toyotas Center? And a Pepsi Center and a Pepsi Centre (I lived in Corner Brook for a while...) Dbrodbeck (talk) 04:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
We could take the concept off on a tangent as well. The TD Garden and RBC Center are the only two American-based NHL rinks sponsored by Canadian banks! Resolute 04:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
None of those arenas/stadiums are in the same league ! Two rinks sponsored by the same company in the same league was note worthy. It wasn't so much the removal of the info, it was your usual edit warring, article ownership, and refusal to BRD. Plus of course the meat puppetry to avoid 3RR in another one of your edit war. UrbanNerd (talk) 12:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Right...so when you do the same thing frequently its ok but when anyone else does it you call it edit warring and article ownership and refusal to brd? Oh and then you go an accuse another good faith editor of being a meat puppet. You know maybe you might eventually learn that its easier to talk about an issue you have on the talk page before you go reverting someone and edit warring? Often it works alot better. -DJSasso (talk) 12:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
UN, If you have an accusation, report it. You are behaving ridiculously. Please stop it, and discuss the issue. We have two people here that disagree with you. For the record, nobody contacted me, so I am nobody's puppet. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oh, and calling other editors dimwits in your edit summary is hardly a way to convince people that you, or your points, are reasonable. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Truth is, UN, I could have reverted you one more time and we both would have been at the same three revert limit. The difference between you and I is that I stopped at two specifically because I had no interest in perpetuating an edit war, while you continued on because you have serious trouble accepting the fact that sometimes, your preferred changes don't have support. The fact that you have deluded yourself into believing Dbrodbeck was acting as a meatpuppet, rather than honestly agreeing that this was irrelevant trivia, speaks right to your bad faith attitude that has resulted in several blocks in recent months. But your bad faith attitude cannot overcome the fact that you do not have support for the inclusion of minor trivia. Resolute 13:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scotiabank Saddledome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scotiabank Saddledome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Scotiabank Saddledome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Scotiabank Saddledome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scotiabank Saddledome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Scotiabank_Saddledome&oldid=1206490699"